So your analysis can be broken down into essentially snarky ad-hominem dismissals of my writing approach, and self exaltation of your own brevity.

Applying descriptions, such as "ridiculous feminist indoctrination" is not evidence of anything, it's merely a string of labels.

While your comment says a lot about your preferences for how you think arguments should be presented, there is nothing there that either refutes my premise or justifies yours.

This is an empty discussion, not worth pursuing further.

Take care.